Vegan Vs. Pescatarian: Which Diet Is Healthier?

There are many different diets that people follow for a variety of reasons, including ethical, environmental, religious, and health reasons. The vegan, vegetarian, and pescatarian diets are three such diets that have gained popularity in recent years. All three diets focus on reducing meat intake, but there are some key differences between them. This article will introduce these diets and discuss their potential health benefits and drawbacks to help you decide which one might be the healthiest option.

Pros and cons of a pescatarian diet

A pescatarian diet is a vegetarian diet that includes fish or other aquatic animals. It is also referred to as a pesco-vegetarian diet.

Pros of a pescatarian diet:

• May protect from disease: Pescatarians have a lower risk of diseases such as diabetes, high blood pressure, and metabolic disorders that increase the risk of heart attacks and strokes.
• Easier to follow than vegetarianism: It is easier to get enough protein each day with the addition of seafood.
• May promote a healthy weight: Replacing meat-based meals with plant-based meals can help cut calories and fat from your diet.
• Can benefit the environment: Choosing certain sustainable seafood options can positively impact the environment.

Cons of a pescatarian diet:

• Some seafood is high in mercury: All seafood and shellfish contain mercury, and certain fish have higher concentrations. Mercury can damage your central nervous system.
• Groceries can be costly: Buying fresh fruits, vegetables, and fish can be expensive.
• Potential vitamin B12 deficiency: Vitamin B12 is typically found in animal foods, so you may get less of it on a pescatarian diet.

Pros and cons of a vegan diet

Pros of a Vegan Diet

A vegan diet has been linked to a range of health benefits. Vegans tend to have lower cholesterol and blood pressure, reducing the risk of heart disease. The focus on low-calorie, nutrient-dense foods can aid in weight loss and help maintain a healthy weight. Research also suggests that a vegan diet can lower the risk of certain types of cancers. A vegan diet is typically rich in fibre, promoting healthy digestion and regular bowel movements, and reducing the risk of constipation and colon-related issues. Additionally, veganism is considered to have a positive impact on the environment. Animal agriculture is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and deforestation, so by not consuming animal products, individuals can reduce their carbon footprint.

Cons of a Vegan Diet

A vegan diet may lack certain essential nutrients such as vitamin B12, iron, calcium, omega-3 fatty acids, and protein. It requires careful planning to ensure adequate nutrient intake. Dining out and social gatherings can also be challenging, as not all restaurants offer vegan options, and not everyone may understand or accommodate vegan dietary preferences. There may also be an initial learning curve involved in transitioning to a vegan diet, including learning new recipes, understanding ingredient alternatives, and familiarising oneself with plant-based nutrition. Finally, specialty vegan products and substitutes can sometimes be more expensive than their non-vegan counterparts.

Health benefits of a pescatarian diet

A pescatarian diet can have several health benefits. Firstly, it can help protect against disease.. Studies have shown that those who follow a pescatarian diet have a lower risk of developing diabetes, high blood pressure, and metabolic disorders that increase the risk of heart attacks and strokes. This is because a pescatarian diet can help lower LDL cholesterol and blood sugar levels.

Secondly, a pescatarian diet may be easier to follow than a vegetarian one. This is because it can be challenging to get enough protein each day when following a vegetarian diet, and the addition of seafood in a pescatarian diet makes this easier.

Thirdly, a pescatarian diet may promote a healthy weight. Replacing meat-based meals with plant-based meals usually means cutting calories and fat, which can help with weight management.

Finally, a pescatarian diet can benefit the environment. Reducing our dependency on meat and making sustainable fish choices can have a positive impact on the environment.

Health benefits of a vegan diet

A vegan diet can be a very healthy alternative to the standard Western diet, which typically includes a lot of meat, ultra-processed foods, saturated fats, and sugar. A vegan diet can help an individual meet their health goals, needs, and preferences.

Weight Loss

A vegan diet can be an effective way to lose weight. A review of 12 studies found that following a vegan diet for 18 weeks led to an average weight loss of 5.5 pounds (2.5 kg), compared with a smaller weight loss of 3.3 pounds (1.5 kg) on a vegetarian diet.

Lower Risk of Chronic Diseases

A vegan diet can also protect against chronic diseases. Eating a whole-food, plant-based diet has been found to be one of the best ways to prevent or delay the development of common chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer.

Reduced Environmental Impact

A vegan diet can also have a positive impact on the environment. One study found that greenhouse gas emissions from vegan diets are 50% lower than diets that include meat.

Nutritional Benefits

A well-thought-out vegan diet can be a very healthy way to eat. It can provide a range of health benefits, from supporting weight management to protecting against chronic diseases. However, it is important to carefully plan a vegan diet to ensure that you are getting all the essential nutrients your body needs.

Increased Energy

A vegan diet can also provide increased energy levels. By eliminating processed and unprocessed red meat, which has been linked to a higher risk of heart disease, a vegan diet can improve heart health and overall energy levels.

Environmental impact of both diets

The environmental impact of vegan and pescatarian diets has been a subject of much research and discussion. Here is a detailed overview of the environmental implications of both dietary choices:

Vegan Diet

The vegan diet, which strictly eliminates all animal products, has been hailed as a more sustainable option compared to diets that include animal products. A comprehensive study analysed the diets of 55,504 individuals in the UK, including vegans, and assessed various environmental indicators. The results revealed that vegan diets had significantly lower environmental impacts across several metrics.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Vegan diets were associated with substantially lower greenhouse gas emissions. Vegan diets produced 30.3% of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of high meat-eaters (>100g of meat per day). When considering all greenhouse gases, vegan diets had 25.1% of the emissions of high meat-eaters. Methane (CH4) emissions, predominantly associated with ruminant production, were particularly notable, with high meat-eaters having 15.3 times higher emissions than vegans.

Land Use: Vegan diets required significantly less land compared to meat-based diets. Land use for vegans was estimated to be 25.1% of that of high meat-eaters, indicating a substantial reduction in the amount of land needed for food production.

Water Use: Water use is an essential aspect of agriculture, and vegan diets showed a considerable reduction in this area as well. Vegan diets were estimated to use 46.4% of the water required by high meat-eaters, indicating a more efficient use of this precious resource.

Eutrophication: Eutrophication is the dense growth of algae and plants due to excess nutrients in water bodies. Vegan diets were found to have a positive impact on reducing eutrophication, with an estimated impact of 27.0% compared to high meat-eaters.

Biodiversity Loss: Biodiversity loss is a critical concern, and vegan diets can play a role in mitigating this issue. Vegan diets were associated with 34.3% of the biodiversity loss attributed to high meat-eaters, indicating a substantial reduction in the impact on terrestrial vertebrate species.

Pescatarian Diet

The pescatarian diet includes fish and seafood in addition to plant-based foods. While it may offer some environmental benefits compared to a meat-based diet, there are specific considerations regarding its sustainability.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Pescatarians tend to have lower greenhouse gas emissions compared to high meat-eaters due to the reduced consumption of animal products. However, the inclusion of fish and seafood can still contribute to emissions, particularly when including larger fish with higher levels of mercury.

Mercury and Heavy Metal Contamination: This is a significant concern in the pescatarian diet. Fish, shellfish, and other seafood can accumulate mercury and heavy metals in their bodies, which can drive up the concentration of these toxins in larger fish. This has potential health implications and can also impact the environment, especially when contaminated fish are released back into the water.

Water Pollution: The impact of the pescatarian diet on water pollution is a mixed bag. On the one hand, reducing meat consumption can lead to decreased water pollution. On the other hand, the accumulation of mercury and heavy metals in seafood can contribute to water pollution if not properly managed.

Land Use: Pescatarians may have a lower land use impact compared to high meat-eaters, as they still consume plant-based foods as the primary component of their diet. However, the land use impact will depend on the specific types of fish and seafood included in the diet.

Biodiversity Loss: The inclusion of fish and seafood in the pescatarian diet may have an impact on biodiversity. Overfishing and destructive fishing practices can contribute to biodiversity loss, particularly in marine ecosystems.

In summary, both the vegan and pescatarian diets offer environmental benefits compared to diets high in meat consumption. The vegan diet, with its strict exclusion of all animal products, generally has a more significant positive impact on the environment across various indicators. The pescatarian diet, while a step in the right direction, may have a lesser impact, particularly if it includes larger, predatory fish with higher levels of mercury.

Frequently asked questions